2. Atwood SA, Currier JH, Mayor MB, Collier JP, Van Citters DW, Kennedy FE. Clinical wear measurement on low contact stress rotating platform knee bearings. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 431–440.

3. Fisher J, McEwen H, Tipper J, Jennings L, Farrar R, Stone M, Ingham E. Wear-simulation analysis of rotating-platform mobile-bearing knees. Orthopedics 2006; Sep; 2936–2941.

4. Morra EA, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS. The effects of external torque on polyethylene tibial insert damage patterns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; May; 90–100.

5. McEwen HM, Fisher J, Goldsmith AA, Auger DD, Hardaker C, Stone MH. Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001; Oct-Dec; 12:1049–1052.

6. Wang A, Stark C, Dumbleton JH. Mechanistic and morphological origins of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacement prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1996; 210: 141–155.

7. Healy WL, Lorio R, Lemos MJ. Athletic activity after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Nov; 65–71.

8. Huang CH, Ma HM, Lee YM, Ho FY. Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416: 265–270.

9. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 705–711.

10. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992; 74: 980–986.

11. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D et al.. A mobile bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. Amulticentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85: 62–67.

12. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392:101–105.

13. Jeffrey RS, Morris RW,Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73: 709–714.

14. Komistek RD, Kane TR, Mahfouz M, Ochoa JA, Dennis DA. Knee mechanics: a review of past and present techniques to determine in vivo loads. J Biomech. 2005; 38: 215–228.

15. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik – vorläufige klinische Erfahrungen und prospektiv vergleichende Studie gegenüber konventioneller lmplantationstechnik Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001; 139: 109–116.

16. Jacobs W, Anderson P, Limbeek J, Wymenga A. Mobile bearing vs. fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; CD003130. Review.

17. Van der Bracht H, Van Maele G, Verdonk P, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Freeman M. Is there any superiority in the clinical outcome of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis designs compared to fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis designs in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint? A review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 367–374.

18. Post ZD, Matar WY, van de Leur T, Grossman EL, Austin MS. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: better than a fixed-bearing? J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25: 998–1003.

19. Pietsch M, Hofmann S. Von der tibiofemoralen Instabilität zur Luxation in der Knieendoprothetik. Orthopäde; 2007; 36: 917–927.

20. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Shukla S, Bijjawara M. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at aminimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 2290–2296.

21. Sansone V, da Gama Malchèr M. Mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis: a 5– to 9-year follow-up of the first 110 consecutive arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19: 678–685.

22. Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M et al.. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1425–1430.

23. Pour AE, Parvizi J, Slenker N, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF. Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1735–1741.

24. Robertsson O. Knee arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 1–4. Review.

25. Mabry TM, Vessely MB, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ. Revision
total knee arthroplasty with modular cemented stems: long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 100– 105.

26. Goldstein WM, Gordon AC, Swope S, Branson J. Rotating platform revision total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2012; 25: 45–50.

27. Matsuda Y, Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Ishii R. Effect of flexion angle on coronal laxity in patients with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty prostheses. J Orthop Sci. 2005; 10: 37–41.

28. Cheng T, Zhao S, Peng X, Zhang X. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 1307–1322.

29. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20: 282–288.