E-Mail: buecking@med.uni-marburg.de

Literatur

1. Diagnosedaten der Krankenhäuser ab 2000 (Fälle, Pflegetage, durchschnittliche Verweildauer). Gliederungsmerkmale: Jahre, Behandlungsort, Alter, Geschlecht, Verweildauer, Gesundheitsbericht des Bundes, http://www.gbe-bund.de/gbe10.

2. Institut für Qualität & Patientensicherheit, Qualitätsindikatoren, präoperative Verweildauer, http://www.bqs-qualitaetsindikatoren.de/2008/ergebnisse/leistungsbereiche/hueftgelenknahe_femurfraktur/indikatoren/1/82914/referenzbereich.

3. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision,Version for 2007World Health Organization, http://apps.who. int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10
online/.

4. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2001) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 15: 394–400

5. Ahrengart L, Tornkvist H, Fornander P, Thorngren KG, Pasanen L, Wahlstrom P, Honkonen S, Lindgren U (2002) A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res:209–222

6. Aune AK, Ekeland A, Odegaard B, Grogaard B, Alho A (1994) Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures. 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 65:127–130

7. Becker C, Gebhard F, Fleischer S, Hack A, Kinzl L, Nikolaus T, Muche R (2003) [Prediction of mortality, mobility and admission to long-term care after hip fractures]. Unfallchirurg 106:32–38

8. Bonnaire F, Lein T, Bula P (2011) [Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants]. Unfallchirurg 114:491–500

9. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT (1991) Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:330–334

10. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) „Mini-mental state“. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

11. Friedl W, Clausen J (2001) [Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk]. Chirurg 72: 1344–1352

12. Gillespie W (2002) Hip fracture. Clin Evid:1126–1148

13. Goulidakis V, Theocharakis S, Chronopoulos V, Drakoulakis E, Pastroudis A (2009) Good outcome of 172 pertrochanteric hip fractures treated with Gamma-Nail in our department. Injury 40, Supplement 2:S8-S9

14. Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, Martinez A, Cuenca J (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369

15. Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995–2004: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 19: 1139–1145

16. Kostuj T, Smektala R, Schulze-Raestrup U, Müller-Mai C (2011) [Pertrochanteric fractures : What impact do surgical timing and implant choice have on the outcome?]. Unfallchirurg

17. Lohmann R, Frerichmann U, Stöckle U, Riegel T, Raschke MJ (2007) [Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly. Analysis of data from health insurance providers on more than 23 million insured persons--part 1]. Unfallchirurg 110:603–609

18. Marks R (2010) Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970–2009. Int J Gen Med 3:1–17

19. Marks R (2010) Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970–2009. Int J Gen Med 3:1–17

20. ME M, S N, P K, J S (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, New York

21. Miedel R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Söderqvist A, Tidermark J (2011) Musculoskeletal function and quality of life in elderly patients after a subtrochanteric femoral fracture treated with a cephalomedullary nail. J Orthop Trauma 25: 208–213

22. Muller M, Seitz A, Besch L, Hilgert RE, Seekamp A (2008) [Proximal femur fractures: results and complications after osteosynthesis with PFN and TGN]. Unfallchirurg 111:71–77

23. Müller T, Topp T, Kühne CA, Gebhart G, Ruchholtz S, Zettl R (2011) The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 35:1237–1243

24. Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2010) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD000093

25. Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK (1993) A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75: 789–793

26. Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A: 372–381

27. Tidermark J, Zethraeus N, Svensson O, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S (2002) Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 16:34–38

28. Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Munoz FM, Tufanisco CB (2005) Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 19:229–233

29. White SM, Griffiths R (2011) Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: A report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN). Injury 42:1230–1233