14. Meric G, Gracitelli GC, Aram LJ, Swank ML, Bugbee WD: Variability in distal femoral anatomy in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: Measurements on 13.546 computed tomography scans. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 1835–8

15. Almaawi AM, Hutt JRB, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P-A: The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 2133–40

16. Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J: The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients?: The Concept of Constitutional Varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 470: 45–53

17. Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J: Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 461: 238–44

18. Howell SM, Howell SJ, Hull ML: Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92: 98–104

19. Cobb JP, Dixon H, Dandachli W, Iranpour F: The anatomical tibial axis: reliable rotational orientation in knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume 2008; 90: 1032–8

20. Clary C, Aram L, Deffenbaugh D, Heldreth M: Tibial base design and patient morphology affecting tibial coverage and rotational alignment after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA 2014; 22: 3012–8

21. Dai Y, Scuderi GR, Bischoff JE, Bertin K, Tarabichi S, Rajgopal A: Anatomic tibial component design can increase tibial coverage and rotational alignment accuracy: a comparison of six contemporary designs. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA 2014; 22: 2911–23

22. Meier M, Webb J, Collins JE, Beckmann J, Fitz W: Do modern total knee replacements improve tibial coverage? Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA 2018; 366: 155

23. Levengood GA: Mechanical Alignment of a Customized TKA Implant System as Determined by Intraoperative Computer Navigation. BASK 2014, n.d.

24. Arbab D, Reimann P, Brucker M, Bouillon B, Luring C: Alignment in total knee arthroplasty – A comparison of patient-specific implants with the conventional technique. The Knee 2018; 25: 882–7

25. Ivie CB, Probst PJ, Bal AK, Stannard JT, Crist BD, Sonny Bal B: Improved radiographic outcomes with patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2014; 29: 2100–3

26. Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, Hoff W: In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics 2005; 38: 241–53

27. Tanifuji O, Sato T, Kobayashi K et al.: Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2011; 16: 710–8

28. Morooka T-A, Hamai S, Miura H et al.: Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. Journal of Orthopaedic Research: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 2008; 26: 428–34

29. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Colwell CEJ et al.: In vivo anteroposterior femorotibial translation of total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 47–57

30. Culler SD, Martin GM, Swearingen A: Comparison of adverse events rates and hospital cost between customized individually made implants and standard off-the-shelf implants for total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 2017; 3: 257–63

31. Board TNE: 14th Annual Repot 2017. 2017 ed. n.d.

Korrespondenzadresse

Dr. Wolfgang Fitz

Brigham Health

75 Francis Street

Boston MA 02115

USA

wfitz@bwh.harvard.edu