24. Hansen E, Shearer D, Ries MD: Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 494–502

25. Holt GE, Dennis DA: Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 429: 209–14

26. Horas K, Arnholdt J, Steinert AF, Hoberg M, Rudert M, Holzapfel BM: Periazetabuläre Defektklassifikation in Zeiten von 3D-Bildgebung und patientenspezifischer Therapieprotokolle. [Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols]. Der Orthopäde. 2017; 46: 168–78

27. IQTIG. Qualitätsreport 2016. 2017: 148–52

28. Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL: Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part I: cementless shells. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009; 38: 509–14

29. Issack PS, Nousiainen M, Beksac B, Helfet DL, Sculco TP, Buly RL: Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009; 38: 550–6

30. Jasty M: Jumbo cups and morsalized graft. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29: 249–54

31. Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Lakstein D, Gross AE: Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 870–6

32. Koster G, Willert HG, Kohler HP, Dopkens K: An oblong revision cup for large acetabular defects: design rationale and two- to seven-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13: 559–69

33. Lee JM, Nam HT: Acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty using an impacted morselized allograft and a cementless cup: minimum 10-year follow-up.. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 1057–60

34. Lie SA HL, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE: Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Joint Surg. 2004; 86-B: 504–9

35. Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA et al.: Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A(1): 27–32

36. Muhlhofer HM, Pohlig F, Kanz KG et al.: Prosthetic joint infection development of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm. Eur J Med Res. 2017; 22: 8

37. Older J: Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years.J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17: 675–80

38. Paprosky W, Sporer S, O‘Rourke MR: The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 453: 183–7

39. Paprosky WG, Magnus RE: Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 298: 147–55

40. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM: Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994; 9: 33–44

41. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C: Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 208: 108–13

42. Rudert M, Holzapfel BM, Kratzer F, Gradinger R: Das Kranialpfannensystem zur defekttypassoziierten Therapie von Azetabulumdefekten. [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010; 22: 241–55

43. Schelfaut S, Cool S, Mulier M: The use of structural periacetabular allografts in acetabular revision surgery: 2.5–5 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129: 455–61

44. Shinar AA, Harris W: Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997; 79: 159–68

45. Sporer SM, O‘Rourke M, Paprosky WG: The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision.J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20 (4 Suppl 2): 79–84

46. Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ: Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2012; 470: 428–34

47. Tohtz S, Katterle H, Matziolis G, Drahn T, Perka C: Die Rekonstruktion großer segmentaler Knochendefekte mit der Sockelpfanne--Einflussfaktoren auf das Migrations- und Lockerungsverhalten [The reconstruction of extended acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty--risk factors for migration and loosening using the pedestal cup]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Mar–Apr; 145: 176–80

48. Van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI: High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89: 296–300

49. Wind MA, Jr., Swank ML, Sorger JI: Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Orthopedics. 2013; 36:e260–5

50. Wroblewski BM: Current trends in revision of total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 1984; 8: 89–93