Übersichtsarbeiten - OUP 12/2015

Monosegmentale, degenerativ erworbene Spinalkanalstenose
Unilaterale Dekompression versus unilaterale Dekompression mit Undercutting der Gegenseite bei beidseitiger Symptomatik Unilateral decompression with contralateral undercutting versus unilateral decompression for symptomatic, bilateral spinal stenosis

27. Stromqvist F, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Dural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcome. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 825–828

28. Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC et al. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49: 135

29. Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21: 179–186

30. Jakola AS, Sorlie A, Gulati S, Nygaard OP, Lydersen S, Solberg T. Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study. BMC Surg 2010; 10: 34.10.1186/ 471–2482– 10–34

31. Wu AM, Zhou Y, Li Q et al. Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e97142

32. Finneson BE, Cooper VR. A lumbar disc surgery predictive score card. A retrospective evaluation. Spine 1979; 4: 141–4

33. Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 7 :579–86

34. Weiner BK, Walker M, Brower RS, McCulloch JA. Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine 1999; 24: 2268–72

Fussnoten

1 Wirbelsäulenzentrum Marburg

2 KKH Rheinfelden

SEITE: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8